neart.ai
EcosystemStoryHow We BuildPricingBlog
Try Inspected →
neart.ai
EcosystemStoryHow We BuildBlog

Ní neart go cur le chéile

A SaltCore Group Limited company

© 2026 neart.ai · SaltCore Group Limited. All rights reserved.

SEO & Technical SEO

How to Improve Largest Contentful Paint (LCP): A Step-by-Step Diagnostic

11 March 20264 min read

## The short answer


To improve Largest Contentful Paint, first identify exactly which element is your LCP, then attack the four things that delay it: slow server response, render-blocking CSS and JavaScript, slow resource loading (usually images or fonts), and client-side rendering delays. Fix them in that order, because each stage gates the next. Aiming for an LCP of 2.5 seconds or under at the 75th percentile of real users is the target you are working toward.


## Step 1: Find the LCP element


You cannot fix what you have not identified. Open PageSpeed Insights or Chrome DevTools and look for the element flagged as the Largest Contentful Paint. It is usually one of:


- A hero image or background image

- A large heading block

- A video poster frame

- A prominent paragraph of text


Everything that follows depends on knowing this element, because the goal is to make *that specific thing* appear faster.


## Step 2: Break LCP into its sub-parts


LCP is made of four sequential phases, and diagnosing which phase dominates tells you what to fix:


1. **Time to first byte (TTFB)** — how long the server takes to respond.

2. **Resource load delay** — the gap before the browser even starts fetching the LCP resource.

3. **Resource load time** — how long the resource itself takes to download.

4. **Element render delay** — the gap between the resource arriving and it being painted.


If TTFB is 80% of your LCP, optimising images will barely move the needle. Measure first.


## Step 3: Reduce server response time


If TTFB is the bottleneck, look at:


- **Caching** — serve cached HTML where possible rather than rebuilding pages on every request.

- **A CDN** — bring content physically closer to visitors.

- **Database and application work** — slow queries and unoptimised back-end logic delay the first byte.


Server response is foundational; no amount of front-end tuning compensates for a slow origin.


## Step 4: Remove render-blocking resources


The browser cannot paint your LCP element until it has processed render-blocking CSS and, often, synchronous JavaScript. Tactics here include:


- Inlining the small amount of critical CSS needed for above-the-fold content.

- Deferring or asynchronously loading non-critical JavaScript.

- Splitting large CSS files so only what the page needs is blocking.


## Step 5: Make the LCP resource load sooner and faster


If your LCP is an image, this is usually where the biggest wins live:


- **Prioritise it.** Add `fetchpriority="high"` to the LCP image so the browser fetches it early.

- **Never lazy-load it.** Lazy-loading the LCP image is one of the most common self-inflicted wounds; it delays the very element being measured.

- **Serve modern formats.** Use AVIF or WebP with appropriate compression.

- **Size it correctly.** Deliver dimensions appropriate to the device rather than a single oversized file.

- **Preconnect** to the domain serving the resource if it is on a third party.


## Step 6: Address render delay


If the resource arrives quickly but paints late, the problem is usually that the browser is busy or waiting. Causes include:


- Heavy JavaScript hydration on client-rendered pages.

- Fonts blocking text rendering — use `font-display: swap` and preload key fonts.

- The LCP element depending on JavaScript to be inserted into the DOM at all.


Server-side rendering or static generation of above-the-fold content often resolves stubborn render-delay problems.


## A common mistake to avoid


Many teams chase a high Lighthouse score on their laptop and declare victory, only to find field data unchanged. Lab data is for diagnosis; field data is what counts. Always validate improvements against real-user measurements over the following weeks, because the Chrome User Experience Report uses a 28-day rolling window.


## When LCP and INP conflict


Be careful: aggressively deferring JavaScript to improve LCP can sometimes worsen responsiveness if interactions then have to wait for that deferred code. Treat the page experience holistically rather than optimising one metric in isolation. Enterprise teams — including the kind of products neart.ai builds in this space — instrument all three vitals together so that fixing one does not silently regress another.


## Practical takeaway


Work the LCP diagnostic in order: identify the element, break the timing into its four phases, then fix whichever phase dominates — server, render-blocking, resource loading, or render delay. The single highest-leverage move for most sites is ensuring the LCP image is prioritised and never lazy-loaded. Make one change, ship it, and confirm the win in field data before moving on.

Related posts

SEO & Technical SEO

How to Audit Crawl Budget on a Large Site (And Why It Matters)

SEO & Technical SEO

A Technical SEO Audit Checklist for JavaScript-Rendered Sites

SEO & Technical SEO

Auditing Core Web Vitals: How to Diagnose LCP, INP and CLS Problems